Quick SIR Estimator | Sovereign Intent Academy

Question 01 of 07

When justifying a major policy or business decision, what does the leader most often cite?

The constitution, a budget, data, or the law.

Their own gut, "vision," or "destiny."

Religious or moral language, but their budget doesn't match.

Question 02 of 07

Has the leader ever lost a court case, a legislative vote, or an election — and accepted the result?

Yes, they complied publicly, even if they disagreed.

They framed the opposition as disloyal or "enemies of progress."

They ignored the ruling or used their power to reverse it.

Question 03 of 07

Is there publicly available data on how the leader allocates money (budget, capital expenditure, foundation spending)?

Yes, detailed and independently audited.

Some data exists, but security or discretionary spending is opaque.

Almost nothing is verifiable from outside.

Question 04 of 07

Does the leader treat independent institutions (courts, legislature, regulators) as legitimate constraints?

Yes, they comply even when it is inconvenient.

They respect some institutions, but undermine those that criticise them.

Institutions are tools to be used or discarded as needed.

Question 05 of 07

What is the primary motivation for the leader's decisions, based on the evidence?

Long-term economic development, shareholder value, or public good.

Fulfilling a personal vision, a historic "mission," or a national destiny.

Personal enrichment, network protection, or raw political survival.

Question 06 of 07

Is there a known succession plan or a clear constitutional process for replacing this leader?

Yes, it is public, orderly, and has been followed before.

It exists on paper but has never been tested, or is deliberately ambiguous.

There is no plan; the leader is the institution.

Question 07 of 07

Does the leader's public persona match what independent observers and watchdogs report about their behaviour?

Yes, they are consistent across public and private actions.

There is a moderate gap — some performances, occasional revelations.

A significant gap exists; the public image is a deliberate mask.

Your Estimated SIR Score & Strata

—

/ 20

This is an educational estimate · A full Manual Verification requires primary-source forensic research by a Certified Intent Auditor

Book a Free Intent Insight Session

Important: The Quick SIR Estimator is an introductory, educational tool. It does not replace a full forensic Accountability Audit™ conducted by a Certified Intent Auditor, which relies on primary sources and peer review. The Academy accepts no liability for decisions made based on this tool. For commercial-grade governance risk assessment, please book an Intent Insight Session or commission a Manual Verification.